Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $80.0 vs $260.91
- Up to 67% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-11700F - $0.32 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3220T - 267 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2918 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
32%
Price, $
$260.91
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2919 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |