Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2761 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-2367M - 141 vs 118 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |