Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Core i3-2328M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2239 days newer than Core i3-2328M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2328M - 176 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2328M - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$629.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2328M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |