Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i3-2328M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2222 days newer than Core i3-2328M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-2328M - 157 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2328M - 48 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2328M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |