Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $60.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900F - $0.36 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-2120T - 212 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8954 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
17%
Price, $
$432.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |