Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6300 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6300 is 611 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-2120 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-2120 - $74.04 vs $145.86
- Up to 50% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-2120 - $0.44 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 6 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $145.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |