Buy on Amazon
$139.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $134
Availability
MSRP in USD: $134
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 18% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-2400 - 534 vs 454 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - $34.95 vs $139.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i3-14100 - $0.08 vs $0.26 per FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i3-14100 Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16507 minutes ago
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
454
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16507 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-14100
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
