Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1173 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - 148 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $147.99 vs $615.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - $1.0 vs $4.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 60 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |