Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 84% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1620 - 235 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $49.0 vs $127.07
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 55 vs 60 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $127.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
18.153573013759434%
Multi-Core
723
9.85416382717732%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |