Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1598 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - 195 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $76.05 vs $329.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7920X - $0.39 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 58 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
173
88.71794871794872%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
20.52631578947369%
Price, $
$329
23%
Buy for $329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |