Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 547 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10850K - 147 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $94.98 vs $279.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10850K - $0.65 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12228 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |