Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2065 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-6900K - 266 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $83.62 vs $120.0
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 58 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $83.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77165 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
56.26966292134832%
Multi-Core
7118
95.45393589915516%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |