Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 315 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $83.62 vs $175.0
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $83.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74217 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |