Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 75% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3240T - 227 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $25.7 vs $113.6
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $113.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
20.80037226617031%
Multi-Core
971
14.119528864330377%
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |