Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6300 - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $74.04 vs $121.98
- Up to 33% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-12100 - $0.44 vs $0.66 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11048 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11048 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |