Buy on Amazon
$199.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $320
Availability
MSRP in USD: $320
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4771 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4771.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4771 - 578 vs 532 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4771 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $129.0 vs $199.06
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10300 - $0.24 vs $0.34 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
578
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
70%
Price, $
$199.06
64%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4771 3.5 3 LGA 1150 Processor, 8M Cache, up to 3.90 GHz (BX80646I74771)
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-4771
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-4771 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
