Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $89.99 vs $138.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-10600K - $1.61 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Core i3-10105T - 62 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
56
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12386 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
71%
Price, $
$138.95
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $138.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |