Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3129 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than FX-9590 - $39.99 vs $298.02
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - $0.21 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |