Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-560 is 642 days older than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $49.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-560 - $0.39 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Celeron G550 - 130 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |