Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240T is 94 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G550 - 108 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $25.7 vs $49.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G550 - $0.24 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10615 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10615 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
