Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $19.25 vs $89.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-10105T - $0.12 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G540 - 174 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
154
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2182 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
23%
Price, $
$89.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |