Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3236 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 18% better in Remnant II than Celeron G530 - 91 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 32 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$944.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $944.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |