Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2585 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 53% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G530 - 341 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 48 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
341
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$739
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |