Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 637 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $39.0 vs $739.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.15 vs $2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3930T - 284 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 48 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
5%
Price, $
$739
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |