Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1077 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $39.9 vs $1059.22
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 1900% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74990 minutes ago
Buy for $1,059.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.23728813559322%
Multi-Core
992
13.73770945852375%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |