Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1077 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $55.15 vs $1700.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $0.71 vs $20.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Celeron G3900 - 84 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
78
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.24/FPS
3%
Price, $
$1700
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |