Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $39.9 vs $1300.0
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 3600% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3900 - 37 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3900 - $35.14 vs $39.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$35.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1300
3%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core, 48-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
