Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1219 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1840 - 186 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 28 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $302 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |