Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $37.0 vs $749.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 102% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 87 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77155 minutes ago
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
13.737504030957757%
Multi-Core
739
3.519047619047619%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |