Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2860 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 11% better in God of War than Celeron B820 - 178 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 20 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |