Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2301 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron B820 - 358 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
358
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |