Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 345 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron B820 - 454 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |