Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3042 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 49% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron B815 - 121 vs 81 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |