Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3362 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B815 - 108 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |