Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 851 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4170 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron B815 - 163 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |