Key Differences
In short — FX-8370 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8370 is 975 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron B815 - 117 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$234.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $234.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |