Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 2300 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 43% better in Rust than Celeron 847 - 203 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$186
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |