Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 2083 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron 847 - 198 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |