Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 28% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 3965U - 136 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 16 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |