Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 1933 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 11% better in Valheim than Celeron 3965U - 211 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |