Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 83% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron 3865U - 221 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 32 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |