Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 267% better in League of Legends than Celeron 3865U - 165 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
392
28.739002932551323%
Multi-Core
692
7.6027246758954075%
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |