Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 1037U - 316 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 20 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
316
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |