In Atomfall, the FX-9590 is slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9590
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
191 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
79%
Price, $
$282.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
