In Atomfall, the FX-9590 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $52 more expensive!
FX-9590
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 18% cheaper – $229.89 vs $282.02
- Up to 18% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 125 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
78%
Price, $
$282.02
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
63%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
