In Rust, the FX-8320E is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $52 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 23% cheaper – $178.02 vs $229.89
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 279 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 4% better value in Rust – $0.82 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 4% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
44%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
96%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
