In Rust, the FX-8320E is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 9700X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $123 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 41% cheaper – $178.02 vs $301.00
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Rust – $0.85 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Rust
Ryzen 7 9700X
- Up to 38% faster in Rust – 289 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
209 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
42%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
289 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$301
59%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
82%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 9700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 9700X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9700X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
