In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320E is faster than the Core i7-14700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $228 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 56% cheaper – $178.02 vs $405.72
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 63% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.88 vs $2.38/FPS
- Up to 63% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$405.72
43%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
37%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
