In Elden Ring, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $255 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 59% cheaper – $178.02 vs $432.96
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Elden Ring – $1.27 vs $2.94/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Elden Ring
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 5% faster in Elden Ring – 147 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Elden Ring
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
140 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
89%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
147 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
110 FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.96
41%
Value, $/FPS
$2.94/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
