The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $0.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-14600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 0% cheaper – $178.00 vs $178.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Core i5-14600KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
236
100%
Min 1% FPS
160
100%
Price, $
$178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-14600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-14600KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-14600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
