In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $280 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 195 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 76% cheaper – $88.10 vs $368.59
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 79% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.45 vs $2.15/FPS
- Up to 79% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
195 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
88%
Price, $
$368.59
23%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
21%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Aug 15th, 2024 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
